Are Childrens Books Dumbed Down?

Audrey loves to read and has a pretty substantial book collection. She has books originally published in the 40′s and 50′s and books published in the 90′s and 00′s. She has short and simple books and she has longer books.

Reading all these books I have noticed something. A general trend, if you will.

In old old children’s books… the ones published sometime before the 60′s, it is pretty common to see rather complex sentences. Have you ever read the original Peter Rabbit? Or Blueberries for Sal? Those books have some very complex sentences structures. Where as most, more recent books, are full of very short, simple sentences.

I assume this shift was made as parents became more aware of the benefit of reading in terms of children’s language development. The idea being that the more kids could understand and distinguish the words, the quicker they would learn language and be able to interpret what they were hearing.

I wonder if there has been similar shift in how we talk to kids. It seems we do a lot of ‘dumbed’ down talking to kids as well- making the assumption they won’t understand more complex concepts and sentences structures. This has always been one of my pet peeves- how people talk to kids sometimes. It seems to lack respect for their intelligence and ability to understand. I think sometimes it is done with the best of intentions- trying to be inclusive of a child by wanting them to not miss out on what is going on because the conversation is too complex. But for me, it often crosses the line to ‘talking down’ rather then trying to build understanding. Anyway.

I don’t believe books (or conversations) need to be substantially boiled down to their simplest form for even young children to understand. Audrey understands the concepts in “Blueberries for Sal” just as well as she understands more simple books. It doesn’t seem to impact her. Nor do we talk to her in only simple sentences– again, she understands us either way. Every day she surprises us by putting together concepts or remembering something we weren’t sure she got.

Now I am not suggesting we have a burn the book ceremony for any children’s book without a complex sentence to be found. I love so many children’s books in all different styles. And I think it is good for kids to hear simple rhymes and short sentences along with the more complex stuff.

But I often think about how we communicate with and teach our children. And I often think about how we underestimate their intelligence and don’t trust them to be able to do things beyond what we think they can. We don’t let them try to climb, because we are afraid they will fall. And we don’t seem to believe they can understand us, even when we use big words and complex sentences.

Why?

My child amazes me with what she is able to do every day, so why would I ever underestimate her? I try my absolute best to have age appropriate realistic expectations when it comes to behaviour, but not expectations when it comes to ability. What I mean by that is that I don’t expect that my two year old can be awake for 14 hours straight and still be cheerful company. But I don’t underestimate her ability to climb all the way up a windy metal slide. Nor to I underestimate her ability to understand me when I talk to her in full sentences.

Kids get it. More often then we think they do. Bring on the complex sentences. They can handle it.

Blueberries for Sal 300x236 Are Childrens Books Dumbed Down?

Favourite Books for Toddlers

When I was a teenager I worked in the kids section of a book store. I have always loved books and there has always been a special place in my heart for kids books. I love the classics. I don’t think any toddlers library is complete without “Good night Moon”, “Pat the Bunny”, “Peter Rabbit” and “Run away Bunny.” (Wow, write a kids book with a bunny and it will become a classic, apparently.) These books have been around since the 1940′s. Then there are the new classics, like Eric Carle and Sandra Boynton (Who may be the only children author I don’t like).

Before I had kids I knew all these books.

Since having Audrey I have discovered another kids author that I absolutely love. Her books are new new classics, written in the late 1990 and early 2000′s. And since I don’t think any kid should miss out on these books, I thought I would share them with you.

The author is Julia Donaldson and here are my favourite books of hers. Audrey loves these books two and they are often on the list of daily requested books. We ended up with these books from all different places. One was a baby shower gift from a friend, an other was in a pile of hand-me-down books and clothing, an other was a first birthday book from an other friend and the other we bought because we loved the author so much. It was like they were all meant to appear in our book collection. Here are the ones we have by this author:

Gruffalo Favourite Books for ToddlersI love the flow and cadence of this book. A little mouse out-smarts a fictional monster before enjoying his lunch. It’s lovely.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Monkeypuzzle Favourite Books for ToddlersAudrey can recite pretty much this whole book. Particularly the first line, “I’ve lost my Mom”– she says it with a whine and a pout. Poor Monkey needs help finding his mom and a Butterfly helps. One the things I love so much about this book is that when the monkey finally finds someone it is his Dad, not his Mom. One of the few toddler age books I have seen that even mention a father. Yeah fathers!!

 

 

 

 

 

 

oneTed148 Favourite Books for ToddlersPoor Teddy falls out of bed. This book is a great one for learning numbers and the rhymes are wonderful.

 

 

 

 

Snailwhale Favourite Books for ToddlersA perfect book for learning early about the environment and the impact humans have. It also teaches the lesson that we all feel small in the world sometimes, but we can still do great things.  Love it.

 

 

 

I hope you all enjoy these books as much as we do!!

*I am reviewing this books because I love them and am receiving no form of compensation or recognition from either the author or the publisher. I just really really love these books.

Thumbnail photo by Enokson via Flickr Creative Commons

moz screenshot Favourite Books for Toddlers

A Place to Play

Months ago, we moved all our ‘office’ stuff down stairs, so we could turn the extra room upstairs into a play room for Audrey. We noticed that as she was getting older and as we were getting more frustrated with toys all over the floor all over the house, that it might make sense to have a place for her to play. (Don’t worry, we have no illusions that this will fix the toys on the floor problem. We are just hoping for a slight improvement.)

Yeah, sure, she could play in her room. But we have worked very hard to create her room as a quiet place for her to sleep and I am not sure I want her also associating with play… I can just imagine the cry’s I would hear if she could see her toys just feet away from her crib.

So, anyway, we thought about setting up a play room for her. It is really the perfect room in the house for it. I can see the door from the den, which is my favourite place to be. It is a small room that is easy to toddlerize/toddlerproof. It is bright and had built in shelves designed for CD’s, but are actually great for toddler toys. Yesterday we went to Ikea (I love Ikea) and got a nice rug, a big mesh toy box and a bin for her lego. Check it out:

audreysroom e1304261079657 768x1024 A Place to Play

What I love about it (other then the fact it is super cute) is that she can see all her toys. Before, most of her toys ended up in one of two big baskets… meaning that she would pretty much forget about most of her toys as they were lots in piles in the baskets. This allows us to spread things out and keep things visible. There are lots of things for her to spot and play with and then move on to the next thing.

We decided to keep her table and chairs (for colouring and arts and crafts) downstairs so she had something to do there. Along with her baby stroller, because it is better in the big floor space downstairs. But other then that, most of her stuff is in this room now.

audreyintoxbox 300x225 A Place to PlayShe loves it. She got the concept that is was ‘her’ space right away. Now she goes in there and closes the door on us and plays on her own for 10-15 minutes or so. Then she comes out and wants to read a story or something. Oh, and within minutes she figured out how to climb into her mesh toy box— what a great hiding place!

 

Religion in Daycare and the recent changes in Quebec

On Facebook the other day (yes, amoment2think has its own Facebook page!) I shared an article via PhdinParenting (which I believe Annie wrote). It is about a recent announcement from the provincial government of Quebec that they will no longer provide subsidies for daycare’s which provide religious instruction. Here is an other article about the issue via the National Post to take a look at: Quebec Toddlers Can See Religious Symbols but Can’t Have them Explained. Take a read and then head back here.

So, as I mentioned on Facebook, I have been puzzling my thoughts on this all week. First some background. Quebec has a publicly subsidized daycare program, unlike the rest of the Canadian provinces. Other Canadian provinces subsidize some proportion of low income households, but does not guarantee $7/day daycare for all like Quebec does. (I’m jealous!) Also, many provinces provide some financial support to some religious primary and secondary schools via separate school board systems. (See some information via Wikipedia here.) Alberta has a “Public”, “Separate” (aka Catholic) and a “Charter” school system, all which receive some public funding. I know when we vote we indicate if we support the public or separate school system and I assume this has an impact on funding. This article via CBC is a great overview to the issues. Obviously, this is a much much bigger issue. And one that has been going on for a very long time. This change in policy in Quebec is just a catalyst to bring it all up again. Not to mention that Quebec has a unique culture and language and there are often debates there about culture, religion, language and the role of government.

Here are the issues as I see it:

1) Separation of Church and State

In theory, there is suppose to be a separation of Church and State. But in reality, that is not the case. Based on the articles I read in doing a bit of research into this issue, the Canadian Constitution does provide provisions for Catholic school boards in some Canadian provinces. Not to mention the non-secular experience of many students in Public primary and secondary schools across North America. (This post from Parenting Is Political about just that issue is very much worth a read.)

The question remains, to what extend should the government be funding education which is linked to religious instruction? Particularly if that funding funds some religious denominations and not others.

2) Tax dollars funding of Religious instruction

Further to that point, the natural extension is that if the government is funding religious education then, we, as tax payers are funding religious education. And, as I discussed in this post, there is a pretty negative view of religion in general in much of our society right now. So if you happen to be someone who believes that religion is all indoctrination and brainwashing- then reasonably you may be pretty upset that your tax dollars go to fund that. Or, if you are comfortable with religion, but question the teaching of it to children, preferring that religious education wait until they can make their own decisions; or prefer that if children are to be taught religion that they be taught a wide range of religions in a neutral manner and have the opportunity to make their own decisions about that information; again, this use of tax dollars may be concerning. If, on the other hand, you believe that religion is central to some peoples lives and/or cultural heritage or if you tend to be very supportive of religious education, you might be more inclined to not take issue with that use of your tax dollars.

3) Accommodation of Diversity

The next issue is to what extent should our government support diversity when it comes to religious education. What I think is interesting about the Quebec daycare case is that it involves daycare’s which are run by a diversity of religious organizations; Jewish, Muslim, Catholic, Protestant. Unlike the Catholic primary and secondary school issue, where only one religious group is being supported in the education system, these daycare’s represent a diversity of religious organizations. Is allowing religious education to be a part of (very) early childhood education part of the reasonable accommodation of diversity? Particularly when all religions are welcome to be represented, so long as they have enough families who want to enroll their children in the program.

4) Parental Choice in how their children should be educated

So what is wrong with parents choosing to send their kids to religiously affiliated daycare’s with some component of religious education? If all religions can receive public funding and parents have full choice as to where to send their child and there are lots of daycare spots which are secular as well, then what does it matter? Is it hurting anyone? What is the harm? Part of the Quebec’s government’s argument is that it negatively impacts children’s ability to integrate into Quebec society. I find this argument odd. How is understanding and learning about your families religious background having a negative impact on integration into society? Furthermore, isn’t part of the value of Canadian style multiculturalism that people here are like a mosaic. Many people retain their cultural identity while fully participating in Canadian society.

5) Societal values regarding a secular society

I think what this really comes down to is our values around a secular society. Part of what got me thinking about this issue so much is wondering if the government has any right in dictating secular education? If parents want their children to receive particular religious education as a part of their educational curriculum, who is the government to say that that is not appropriate? Is that any more appropriate then the government dictating that children should receive a particular religious education? If there are parents out there that want to send their toddlers to a Catholic/Jewish/Muslim/Protestant/Buddhist/whatever Daycare, why should the government withdraw the funding for that? And as a taxpayer, why should I have say over how an other parent wants to raise their kid? So long as there is equal access to the service…

And I know, there is the argument that if parents want their toddler in a religious daycare program then they could pay for a private one (do they have those in Quebec?) But really that just means that the rich can choose how their child is educated but the poor can’t.

I really don’t know on this one. I do believe in parents having choice. And trusting in their choice. You know what is best for your kid and I know what is best for my kid. What business does the government have in imposing secularism in our lives? At the same time, our education system, which in Quebec includes the daycare system, is the business of the government. How we educate out kids with public funds is very much the governments business, and the government has to make decisions to that effect based on the values of the society. If Quebec’s political culture is one where secularism is a core value, then perhaps it is appropriate to dictate that in the education system. Although, if that is the case, I certainly hope that goes far enough to prevent the type of non-secular activity as described by Parenting is Political— if the government is not going to let  religions provide religious education in their own daycare’s then let’s hope children from non-Christian religions do not have to feel alienated by our non-secular-secular public system. I think my major concern over all this that is should be one way or the other; either all religions have equal access to public funds for education from Daycare on to High school OR all Daycares, Primary and Secondary schools are truly secular. Or all teach a wide range of religious beliefs and practices. From my understanding, Quebec is trying to move towards all schools being truly secular. I wonder what those secular schools look like this time of year.